新乡市2所高校大学生食品安全知识态度行为比较研究  被引量:1

Comparative study on students' knowledge, attitudes and practices of food safety between two colleges in Xinxiang City

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:张国富[1] 梁海燕[1] 卜勇军[1] 刘晓婷[1] 王绪刚[1] 王国昌[2] 田玉慧[1] 

机构地区:[1]新乡医学院公共卫生学院,河南新乡453003 [2]河南科技学院资源与环境学院

出  处:《中国校医》2014年第2期84-86,共3页Chinese Journal of School Doctor

基  金:河南省教育科学"十一五"规划2009年课题(2009-JKGHAG-0602)

摘  要:目的了解新乡市不同高校大学生食品安全知识、态度及行为,探讨影响大学生食品安全行为的主要因素。方法采用自制的食品安全知识、态度和行为调查问卷,采用随机整群抽样的方法,对新乡医学院和河南科技学院965名大学生进行问卷调查及统计分析。结果 2校学生知识题得分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),态度和行为得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),新乡医学院大学生态度分高于河南科技学院,而行为分低于河南科技学院。不同年级、不同专业学生态度分和行为分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论高校需要进一步加强大学生食品安全知识的教育,积极引导学生养成良好的食品安全行为。Objective To understand the status of students' knowledge, attitudes and practices of food safety in different colleges in Xinxiang City, and explore the main factors influencing the food safety practice among them. Methods By using the cluster random sampling method, 965 students were recruited from Xinxiang Medical College and Henan Institute of Science and Technology. All the participants were surveyed with a self-designed questionnaire, and the data were statistically analyzed. Results The scores of students' knowledge of food safety had no significant difference between the two colleges (P 〉 0. 05). The scores of students' attitudes and practices of food safety were significantly different between the two colleges, and among different grades and different majors (P 〈 0.01 or P 〈 0. 05). The scores of students' attitude of food safety of the Xinxiang Medical College were higher than those of the Henan Institute of Science and Technology, but the scores of practice of food safety were vice versa. Conclusious It is an urgent necessary to carry out food safety education among the college students, including increasing their good practice of food safety.

关 键 词:年轻人 学生 食品安全 健康教育 态度 实践 卫生教育 

分 类 号:G478[文化科学—教育学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象