检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨延砚[1] 张巧云[1] 谷莉[1] 刘楠[1] 葛杰[1] 吕铮[1] 吴同绚[1] 王慧[1] 邢剑[1] 周谋望[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学第三医院康复医学科,北京市100191
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2014年第2期192-195,共4页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
摘 要:目的对比康复医师和治疗师分别授课与同台授课两种不同授课模式的学员认可度。方法参加本院2012年度第九届全国骨科康复学习班、并聆听"肘关节伤病的康复"和"腕关节伤病的康复"两次课程的所有学员。两次课程采取不同模式进行授课:前者由医师和治疗师同台授课,后者由医师和治疗师分别授课。所有学员填写针对课程满意度及两种不同授课模式认可情况的调查问卷。问卷包括选择题及文字问答。结果有效问卷45份。学员对两次课程的满意度均在90%以上。77.8%学员更喜欢医师和治疗师同台授课模式,22.2%选择分别授课。93.3%学员表示在今后的教学工作中一定或可能会应用分别授课模式,88.9%一定或可能会应用同台授课模式(χ2=0.549,P=0.459)。结论医师和治疗师同台授课是一种被学员认可的新型康复医学继续教育授课模式。Objective To compare the acceptance of 2 different teaching modes-physicians and therapists teaching together and sepa-rately in continuing education students of rehabilitation medicine. Methods A questionnaire was filled by the students who attended the lec-tures of both Rehabilitation of Elbow Injury and Rehabilitation of Wrist Injury in the 9th National Orthopedic Class. The former lecture was taught by the rehabilitation physician and physical therapist together (together mode), and the latter lecture was taught by the rehabilitation physician and physical therapist separately (separate mode). The questionnaire included the choices and text questions. Results There were 45 copies of effective questionnaire all together. The satisfaction of both lectures were above 90%. As to teaching modes, 77.8%students liked together mode better, and 22.2%students preferd the separate mode. 93.9%students would or maybe use together mode in their future work, and 88.9%in separate mode. Conclusion The mode of physician and therapist giving lectures together is well accepted by students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15