检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南科技学院心理中心,中国425199 [2]中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2014年第2期272-274,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的调查留守经历大学生心理韧性的差异并探讨其影响因素。方法采用青少年心理韧性量表、自编留守情况调查表,对560名大学生进行抽样调查,从中筛选出留守经历大学生245名,无留守经历大学生291名进行数据分析。结果①有留守经历大学生家庭支持得分显著低于无留守经历大学生(P<0.05);有留守经历女生目标专注、家庭支持、支持力总分、心理韧性总分显著低于无留守经历女生(P<0.05);有无留守经历男生心理韧性水平无显著差异(P>0.05);②同为留守经历,男女大学生心理韧性总分无显著差异(P>0.05),但男生情绪控制(t=3.265,P<0.01)、个人力总分(t=2.129,P<0.05)显著高于女生,女生支持力总分显著高于男生(t=-2.143,P<0.05);③留守总时间不同的大学生家庭支持得分差异显著(F=3.074,P<0.05),留守期间与父母联系频率不同的大学生人际协助得分差异显著(F=3.332,P<0.05),与抚养人沟通情况不同的大学生人际协助得分(F=4.91,P<0.01)、支持力总分(F=6.331,P<0.05)、心理韧性总分差异显著(F=3.687,P<0.05);④与抚养人沟通情况、性别及与父母团聚频率对支持力有一定预测作用,预测正确率为10.8%;与抚养人沟通情况对总体心理韧性有一定预测作用,预测正确率为3.7%。结论留守经历对大学生心理韧性有一定影响;可通过加强与抚养人沟通、与父母团聚频率等提升留守儿童,尤其是留守女童的心理韧性水平。Objective To study the difference of psychological resilience between college students with and without left-behind expe- rience, and explore its influencing factors. Methods A total of 560 college students were asked to complete the resilience scale for Chinese adolescents and self-edited questionnaires of college students with left-behind experience, in which 245 subjects with left-behind experience and 291 without such experience were available, and the test results were analyzed. Results (1) The scores of family supporting of college students who had left-behind experience were significantly lower than peers without such experience ( P 〈 0.05 ). while the total score of goal planning, family supporting, supportive power and total resilience of girls with left-behind experience were significantly high- er than peers without left-behind experience (P 〈 0.05 ). There was no significant difference between boys with and without left-behind experience in terms of resilience( P 〉 0.05 ). (2)Though the difference of the total score of resilience between the boys and girls, who had left-behind experience, was not significant( P 〉 0.05 ). The total score of boys'emotion control ( t = 3. 265, P 〈 0.01 ) and individual power ( t = 2. 129, P 〈 0.05 ) were higher than girls, and that of boys supportive power was relatively low compared with girls ( t = -2. 143, P 〈 0.05 ). (3)The difference of the score of family supporting of college students with different left-behind time was significant( F = 3.074 ,P 〈 0.05). The difference of the score of help-seeking of college students was significant ( F = 3. 332, P 〈 0.05 ), who had different frequency of communication with their parents during the period of their left-behind. The differences of the score of help-seeking( F = 4. 91, P 〈 0.01 ), supportive power( F = 6. 331, P 〈 0.05 ), the total score of resilience ( F = 3. 687, P 〈 0.05 ) of college students were significant. @The condition of c
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.75