检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨泽波[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学哲学学院,上海200433
出 处:《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第2期11-20,共10页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(04BZX033)
摘 要:牟宗三在建构自己美学思想的过程中,对康德提出了严厉批评,认为其以目的论讲审美是一种"外离"的作法,有违于原先"内合"的路线。这种批评如果站在儒学立场上当然可行,因为儒家讲审美不需要讲什么目的性;但如果在康德学理系统中则不能这样说,因为康德如此讲是自成系统的。牟宗三批评康德是"外离"并不符合康德美学思想的基本理路,其对《判断力批判》理解的准确性有待讨论。In constructing his own aesthetic theory, Mou Zongsan cruelly criticized kant, thinking kant' s dis- cussion of beauty appreciation based on teleology was a means of offcenterness against the original line of "internal integrity". This criticism of his certainly held water in terms of Confucianism, which discussed beauty appreciation without any initial purpose. In kant' s theoretical system, however, it didn' t for kant said so according to his self- established theoretical system. Therefore, Mou' s criticism of kant' s "offcenterness" didn' t conform to the theoret- ical basis of kant' s aesthetic theory. Further discussion is desirable about the accuracy of his understanding of Cri- tique of Judgment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80