如何看待康德审美思想是一种“外离”?——牟宗三对《判断力批判》理解之商榷  被引量:1

How to Regard Kant's Aesthetic Theory as a Kind of “Offcenterness”——A Discussion on Mou Zongsan's Understanding of Critique of Judgment

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:杨泽波[1] 

机构地区:[1]复旦大学哲学学院,上海200433

出  处:《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第2期11-20,共10页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基  金:国家社会科学基金项目(04BZX033)

摘  要:牟宗三在建构自己美学思想的过程中,对康德提出了严厉批评,认为其以目的论讲审美是一种"外离"的作法,有违于原先"内合"的路线。这种批评如果站在儒学立场上当然可行,因为儒家讲审美不需要讲什么目的性;但如果在康德学理系统中则不能这样说,因为康德如此讲是自成系统的。牟宗三批评康德是"外离"并不符合康德美学思想的基本理路,其对《判断力批判》理解的准确性有待讨论。In constructing his own aesthetic theory, Mou Zongsan cruelly criticized kant, thinking kant' s dis- cussion of beauty appreciation based on teleology was a means of offcenterness against the original line of "internal integrity". This criticism of his certainly held water in terms of Confucianism, which discussed beauty appreciation without any initial purpose. In kant' s theoretical system, however, it didn' t for kant said so according to his self- established theoretical system. Therefore, Mou' s criticism of kant' s "offcenterness" didn' t conform to the theoret- ical basis of kant' s aesthetic theory. Further discussion is desirable about the accuracy of his understanding of Cri- tique of Judgment.

关 键 词:牟宗三 康德 美学思想 《判断力批判》 

分 类 号:B516.31[哲学宗教—外国哲学] B83

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象