社会预警指标的网络测试和纸笔测试方式的等价性比较  

Measurement Invariance of Social Monitoring Indicators between the Paper-and-pencil Survey and the Web-based Survey

作　　者：任孝鹏[1] 陆柯雯[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京100101 [2]中国科学院大学,北京100049

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第2期85-89,共5页Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：中国科学院规划与决策科技支持系统建设项目"社会态度与集群行为监测与预警指标体系研究"(GH11041)资助

摘　　要：本研究的目的在于比较生活满意度、政府满意度、社会风险判断等社会预警指标的网络调查和传统调查的等价性。通过197个大学生间隔一周对社会预警指标进行两次评价,一次是传统的纸笔测试,一次是网络测试。结果表明,生活满意度的线上(4.28)高于线下(4.10);而自我状态、政府满意度、社会风险判断和集群意向的线上和线下没有差异。这说明有的社会预警指标如集群意向的纸笔测试和网络测试的结果相同,有的社会预警指标如生活满意度的纸笔测试和网络测试的结果差异比较大。用网络测试来替代传统的纸笔测试,需要在社会预警指标的选择上做更好地控制和校正。This paper examines the measurement invariance of social monitoring indicators between a paper-and-pencil survey and a web-based survey which includes life satisfaction and government satisfaction, collective intentionality, social risk factors, etc. It gives both a paper-and-pencil survey and a web-based survey per week to 197 undergraduates concerning five social monitoring indicators. The results show that their life satisfaction is higher in the web-based（4. 28） than the paper-and-pencil（4. 10） and that other four indicators have no significant difference. It helps deepen our understanding of measurement invariance of social monitoring indicators and reveals that some indicators such as collective intentionality are almost the same in the two surveys while other indicators like life satisfaction show much variation on different conditions. Thus, there should be some adjustment of the social monitoring indicators when the web-based survey is used to replace the traditional one.

关 键 词：网络测试 纸笔测试 社会预警指标 

分 类 号：B841[哲学宗教—基础心理学]