检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院北京100872
出 处:《教育发展研究》2014年第6期80-84,共5页Research in Educational Development
基 金:中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目(14XNH079)的部分成果
摘 要:我国部分省份大幅度撤点并校的动机受到媒体质疑。本文利用1996-2009年全国省级面板数据,基于官员晋升锦标赛理论,以FDI作为区分各省竞争力的标准,对不同地区撤点并校的动机差异进行理论和实证分析。结果显示:在竞争力较差的弱势省份,大幅度撤点并校与官员晋升锦标有关,撤点并校幅度增加导致教育财政支出所占比重显著下降;在竞争力较强的强势省份,这一结论不稳健。本文所得政策含义为:撤点并校应考虑地区差异,教育财政经费应专款专用。The motive of school mergence in certain province has been questioned by many aspects. This article analyzed the national wide provincial panel data from 1996 to 2009 from the perspective of regional differences. Based on the promotion championship theory, it indicated that, education finance ratio decreased dramatically with the proceeding of school mergence in most underdeveloped provinces, but this phenomenon is less obvious in advanced provinces. This paper shows the policy implication that differentiated education policy should be developed to adapt to different conditions in different provinces, and the government should take advantage of coordination strength by undertaking appropriate education finance centralization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158