检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈坚[1]
机构地区:[1]厦门大学经济学院金融系/福建省统计科学重点实验室,厦门361005
出 处:《管理科学学报》2014年第3期27-36,共10页Journal of Management Sciences in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71201136)
摘 要:"波动率微笑"与资产收益的非正态分布一直是Black-Scholes期权定价模型无法解释的两种现象.为了改进该模型,一种基于交换经济的均衡模型孕育而生.但是传统均衡模型中所假设的预期效用函数无法区分投资人对于波动风险与跳跃风险的不同厌恶程度,从而低估了市场风险溢酬.引入基于扇形偏好的非预期效用函数后,均衡模型产生了由扇形效应所导致的部分风险溢酬,并且可以拟合出显著的波动率微笑曲线.同时,考虑扇形效应后,风险中性的资产收益分布出现了显著的"厚尾"与"左偏"特征.Empirical findings suggest two violations of the Black-Scholes model: the volatility smile and the asymmetrical distribution for underlying asset returns. Although stochastic volatility models based on the no-arbitrage theorem can explain these two phenomena,the alternative pricing method under general equilibrium framework has been seldom studied. The traditional equilibrium model incorporating the expected utility fails to differentiate the investor's different risk preferences towards the diffusive uncertainty and the jump risk. However,with the fanning preference,the model is able to capture an additional risk premium,and generates a pronounced volatility smile. On the other hand,adopting the fanning effect results in a leptokurtic and leftskewed distribution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.106