检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙晓宏[1] 陈玲[1] 罗洞波[1] 欧江华[1]
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院,新疆乌鲁木齐830011
出 处:《医学研究与教育》2014年第1期108-110,共3页Medical Research and Education
基 金:新疆医科大学教育改革项目(YG2013097)
摘 要:目的探讨基于问题式的教学方法(PBL)在胸部肿瘤外科临床带教中的应用效果。方法选择新疆医科大学厚博学院5年制临床医学专业学生34人,在胸部肿瘤外科见习期间将其分为PBL教学组和传统讲授式教学法(LBL)教学组,每组17人,分别采取PBL和传统LBL的教学方法对2组学生教学,并进行2组教学效果的比较。结果 PBL教学组学生的基础知识考试成绩及临床病例分析的考试成绩均优于传统LBL教学组。PBL教学组学生自主学习能力、临床思维能力和知识理解能力均优于传统LBL教学组。结论 PBL教学方法可提高胸部肿瘤外科见习学生的学习效果,增强他们的临床工作能力。PBL教学方式在胸部肿瘤外科临床带教教学中具有一定的推广价值。Objective To investigate the role of PBL teaching method in clinical practice of thoracic oncological surgery. Methods 34 students of clinical medical specialty in Xinjiang Medical University were randomly divided into PBL group (Problem-based learning group, n=17) and (traditional LBL group traditional lecture-based learning group, n=17). The effectiveness of these two different teaching group were compared. Results Both average scores of common knowledge and clinical case analysis in PBL group were signiifcantly higher than those of LBL group. The student's ability of self learning, the way of clinical thinking and the capability of knowledge understanding in PBL group were signiifcantly better than those in LBL group. Conclusion The way of PBL can improve the effectiveness of medical student's learning in the clinical practice of thoracic oncological surgery, enhance their capability of patients treatment. The PBL teaching method in practice of thoracic oncological surgery has certain promotion value.
关 键 词:基于问题式教学法 讲授式教学法 临床带教 胸部肿瘤外科
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249