钢轨型面对重载轮轨匹配关系影响  被引量:3

Effect of Rail Profile on Matching Behavior of Heavy-Haul Wheel/Rail

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:钟浩[1] 王文健[1] 刘启跃[1] 

机构地区:[1]西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室摩擦学研究所,四川成都610031

出  处:《机械设计与制造》2014年第4期61-64,共4页Machinery Design & Manufacture

基  金:国家自然科学基金项目(51174282);国家重点实验室自主研究课题(TPL1301)

摘  要:基于静态接触和动力学分析,研究了两种钢轨型面与LM踏面匹配时的重载轮轨关系行为。结果表明:75kg/m钢轨与LM型面匹配时的最大正压力、剪应力和等效应力均大于60kg/m钢轨的匹配结果;75kg/m钢轨匹配时轮轨接触点较集中,存在两次明显的轮轨接触点跳跃现象;75kg/m钢轨型面与LM匹配时的轮轨横向力、脱轨系数和轮轨冲角均大于60kg/m钢轨匹配的结果,而轮重减载率和轮轨垂向力无明显变化。综合分析认为60kg/m钢轨型面与LM踏面轮轨匹配关系更佳,建议对重载75kg/m钢轨型面进一步优化设计以获得最佳的轮轨匹配关系。Based on the static contact and dynamics analysis, it studies the heavy wheel/rail relationship behavior of two rail profile with LM tread match. The results showed that: maximum pressure, shear stress and equivalent stress of 75kg/m rail mat, ching LM tread are greater than matching results of 60kg/m rail; contuct point of 75kg/m rail matching of wheel rail is concentrated, and there are twice relatively large wheel-rail contact pointjump phenomenon; wheel rail lateral force, derailment coefficient and the attack angle of 75kg/m rail matching LM tread are higher than matching results of 60kg/m rail, while the rate of wheel load reduction and the wh, eel rail vertical farce do not change significantly. Accarding to all the numerical results, it is found that re, arching relationship of 60kg/m rail profile with LM tread is better, and the proposal of 75kg/m rail profile further optimizes the design to obtain the best matching relation between the wheel/rail.

关 键 词:重载铁路 钢轨型面 轮轨 动力学 

分 类 号:TH16[机械工程—机械制造及自动化] U213[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象