被迫行为辩护事由之类型化分析  

Different Reasons Defend on Forced Action

作　　者：张毅 张健[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省绍兴市越城区人民法院,浙江绍兴312000 [2]浙江大学,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《行政与法》2013年第10期124-128,F0003,共6页Administration and Law

摘　　要：对相似行为的类型化立法能够有效提高司法效率和裁判的准确度。同样是外在强制力作用下的加害行为,基于意志自由程度、损害结果大小的不同,在刑罚处理上应有所区别:无罪过事件因违法阻却当无罪,善意的加害因保全了更大法益当免责,行为强度过限而造成不必要之损害可主张罪小责轻。上述分类是针对自愿与被迫交叉行为作出的谨慎处理。In the cfiminal legislative,the same requirement is suitable on similar behavior,and different reasons defend on different facts is able to improve judicial efficiency and accuracy of the referee.Because of basing on different motivation and damage results are different,action carried out under the external force mandatory should bear different punishment.Action without fault should he sentenced innocence;Harmful behavior based on protecting other more benefit,the perpetrator should be excused;Protected interest is less than the damaged result,the perpetrator should have the fight of asking smaller punishment.At last,we should carefully treat crossover behavior with voluntary and forced.

关 键 词：被迫行为 类型化 违法阻却 责任阻却 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]