物权变动之有因性、无因性及其罗马法渊  

Causality and Abstraction in Property Transfer and Their Common Derivation from Roman Law

作　　者：约勒.法略莉 赵毅[3] 

机构地区：[1]瑞士伯尔尼大学 [2]意大利米兰大学 [3]厦门大学法学院

出　　处：《求是学刊》2014年第3期18-24,共7页Seeking Truth

摘　　要：物权变动是私法的中心问题之一,在欧陆民法典中,它在三个层面上体现出相反原则之对立:合意原则与交付原则,统一原则与分离原则,无因性原则和有因性原则。德国法和瑞典法在物权变动上的规定几乎完全不同,前者采纳的是无因性原则,后者则采纳了有因性原则。两种原则各有利弊,但都起源于罗马法。要式买卖和拟诉弃权与无因性原则有关,罗马法上的交付则是有因性原则的渊源。因此,罗马法可能是更好地理解物权变动中的有因性原则、无因性原则并比较两者优劣之关键。Property transfer is one of the main issues in private law. In civil codes of European conti- nent, there are antagonist principles in three ranges： the principle of the consensus and the principle of tradition, the principle of unity and the principle of separation, a subdivision between abstraction and causality. German law and Swiss law have nearly complete differences in the systems of abstrac- tion and causality. German law adopts the former while Swiss law adopts the latter. The two systems have advantages and disadvantages, but both of them originally come from Roman law. Mancipatio and in iure cession are related to abstraction while traditio is the historical source of causality. For this reason Roman law could be the key to the better understanding of the advantages and disadvan- tages of causality and abstraction principles.

关 键 词：物权变动 有因性原则 无因性原则 罗马法 

分 类 号：D913.2[政治法律—民商法学]