检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:凌霄[1]
机构地区:[1]成都中医药大学马克思主义学院
出 处:《医学与法学》2014年第2期73-76,共4页Medicine and Jurisprudence
摘 要:诱惑侦查在打击特定犯罪时具有独特优势,在我国侦查实践中已经得到一定程度的采用。但第十一届全国人民代表大会第五次会议所通过的新《刑事诉讼法》第一百五十一条但书条款却对诱惑侦查的合法性给予了否定性评价。本文拟从两大法系主要代表性国家对于这一问题的规制着手,对我国刑事诉讼制度引入诱惑侦查的必要性以及如何进行制度设计进行探讨。Entrapment Detection has its unique advantages in fighting against some specific crimes, and has been adopted in some aspects of detecting practice in our country. While in Article 151 of the newly amended Criminal Procedural Law which has been adopted in the Fifth Session of the llth National People's Congress, the legitimacy of entrapment detection has been given the negative evaluation. This article, starting from the perspective of regulations of entrapment detection of some typical representative states of the two legal systems, intends to discuss the necessity to adopt such system and the methods of system design.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.140.32