在本质主义与反本质主义之间——文艺学学科反思与重构研究聚焦  

Between Essentialism and Anti-Essentialism ——Focusing on the Reflection and Reconstruction of Literature Theory Subject

作　　者：席志武[1] 于瑞[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学文学院,北京100875 [2]江西科技师范大学理工学院,南昌330108

出　　处：《江汉学术》2014年第1期88-94,共7页JIANGHAN ACADEMIC

摘　　要：受西方后现代主义思潮的影响,近年来国内文学理论界兴起一股反本质主义的文论研究走向。本质主义与反本质主义的争论,引发了学界对传统研究模式的深入反思和讨论,其中呈现出几种颇具代表性的研究范式:如陶东风的"建构主义"、南帆的"关系主义"、王一川的"本土主义"、杨春时的"超越主义"、童庆炳的"对话主义"等。上述五家都是在反本质主义思潮影响下对文学理论研究做出的具体调整,他们一致要求打破传统本质化、普遍化的言说方式,对僵化的思维模式进行突破,从具体的历史语境出发,建构起新的文学阐释模式。这种对文艺学进行反思与重构的路径丰富多样、各具特色,共同汇集成一种时代潮流,成为新世纪理论界一种普遍化的学术倾向。对他们进行梳理无疑对于后来的文艺学研究有着重要的启示和借鉴意义。Affected by the impact of postmodernism,domestic literary theorists began an anti-essen- tialist tendencies. The controversy between essentialism and anti-essentialism sparked academic research on the model of traditional literary theory, which presents several representative research paradigm：Tao Dongfeng＇ s Constructivism; NanFan ＇ s Connectionism; Wang Yichuan ＇ s Nativism; Yang Chunshi ＇ s Transcendentalism ;Tong Qingbing＇ s Dialogism,etc. Those are specific adjustments on Literary Studies by the impact of the anti-essentialism. They unanimously asked to break the traditional speaking mode of es- sentialism and generalization, starting from the specific historical context, to construct a new model of lit- erary interpretation. Ways of the reflection on literary theory and reconstruction are diverse, unique, bringing together into a common trend of the times, and becoming a generalized academic tendency in new century. To study them is undoubtedly helpful to later literary study with important inspiration and reference.

关 键 词：本质主义 反本质主义 建构主义 关系主义 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]