检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖明华[1]
出 处:《中国文学研究》2014年第2期14-17,共4页Research of Chinese Literature
基 金:江西社科规划2013年度课题(13WX24);江西师范大学2012年度科研计划项目的阶段性成果
摘 要:随着大众文化的纵深发展,形成于1990年代的"新左派"大众文化研究范式的可取之处及其局限性都越加明显。简而言之,其可取之处是对大众文化的意识形态性及其资本化的文化逻辑有致命地批评。其局限性主要是它未曾对大众文化作具体化与语境化的考辨,因此不能积极地看待大众文化的性质与功能。这在一定程度上使得当前大众文化研究的价值观出现了问题。因此有必要对"新左派"大众文化研究范式进行再考察,这对依然处在转型中的当代文学理论建设与发展也不无启发意义。With the further development of popular culture,merits and limitations of "New Left" paradigm of popular culture study that formed in the 1990's are increasingly obvious.In short,there are fatal criticism on the ideology of popular culture and its cultural logic of capitalization, which is its merits.Its main limitation is that it was never differentiate and analyzes popular culture in specific and contextualized manner,the nature and function of popular culture can not be viewed positively therefore, the values problem of the current popular culture studies axe affect by it to some extent, it is necessary to reexamine "new left" paradigm of popular culture study. It also has the significance to contemporary literary theory construction and development which is still in transition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7