关键词解读:非法实物证据排除规则的解释与适用  被引量:34

Interpreting the Illegal Material and Papery Evidence Exclusion Rule and Its Application

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:万毅[1] 

机构地区:[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610065

出  处:《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第3期125-140,共16页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition

基  金:2011年度国家社科基金重点项目"司法改革与我国刑事证据制度完善"(11AFX015);教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"资助项目:"隐形刑事诉讼法"(NCET-10-0602)

摘  要:中国新刑诉法第54条确立的非法物证、书证排除规则在法解释学上,尚有诸多问题有待探讨。对于补正或合理解释这一要件,应当作如下解释,即只有属于瑕疵证据的物证、书证才可以补正或合理解释,属于非法证据的则应直接排除。非法取得的笔录类证据、视听资料、电子数据等,属于广义的实物证据,也应适用非法证据排除规则。"不符合法定程序"是指不符合法律及相关司法解释的取证程序规定;取证主体不应作为非法证据的构成要件。"可能严重影响司法公正"应从实体上判断非法取证是否影响证据的客观真实性,同时从程序上判断是否损害司法的权威及公信力。对于非法物证、书证排除规则,必须在一定程度上引入毒树之果原则,并附带设置必要的例外。Concerning the interpretation of China's illegal material and papery evidence exclusion rule, there are still some issues deserving our exploration. Only defective evidences can be remedied or justifiably explained, and those that are not defective evidences should be excluded immediately. Notes evidences, audio or video evidences, and electronic data evidences collected by illegal methods should be excluded, too. "Breaching the legal procedure" refers to the methods to collect evidences that breach the law and judicial explanation, and the subject issue should not be a factor in judging whether the evidences are legal. We should judge whether the method to collect evidences impairs judicial justice from substantiality and procedure at the same time. The rule of fruit of poisonous tree should be set up, with some necessary exceptions of this Yule.

关 键 词:非法证据排除 物证 书证 法解释 

分 类 号:DF713[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象