劳务派遣工工会:来自企业外的独立力量及其维权效应  

Union Effects for Dispatched Workers:Evidence from Two Automobile Companies in Shanghai,China

作　　者：黄伟[1,2] 陈钊[1] 陈耀波[3] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学中国社会主义市场经济研究中心 [2]上海立信会计学院经贸学院 [3]香港城市大学公共政策系

出　　处：《经济社会体制比较》2014年第3期181-194,共14页Comparative Economic & Social Systems

基　　金：教育部重点研究基地重大项目"中国的企业社会责任行为研究"(项目编号:13JJD790007);国家社会科学重点项目"制度变迁视角下的中国二元经济转型研究"(项目编号:11AZD084)

摘　　要：文章首先基于上海大众和通用汽车企业车间工人的调查数据,检验了工会对劳务派遣工和正式工工资福利以及维权方式选择的异质性作用。研究发现,工会显著提高了劳务派遣工权益,特别是月福利性收入,但对正式工的月基本工资和月福利没有显著影响。这说明独立于用工企业的劳务派遣企业工会的确更有可能代表和维护工人利益。文章研究还发现,工会显著减弱了正式工选择游行示威、罢工和上访等激烈维权方式的意愿,但这一作用在劳务派遣工身上并未体现,这意味着与用工企业更少利益相关的派遣工工会更可能代表工人的利益而不是帮助政府或企业进行"维稳"。Based on the survey of workers in Shanghai Volkswagen and General Motors, this paper examines union effects for both regular and dispatched workers. We find out that joining union significantly improves dispatched workers＇ condition, especially their monthly benefits, while this result does not hold for regular workers. We argue that this results from the independence of the union of dispatched workers. We also find out that union significantly reduces regular workers＇ willingness to choose intense ways （such as demonstrations, strikes or petition） to protect their interests, which is not found for dispatched workers. This implies that the union for dispatched workers more likely works for the interests of workers rather than helping the government or firm to maintain social stability.

关 键 词：劳务派遣 工资福利 维权方式 《劳动合同法》 

分 类 号：C93[经济管理—管理学]