“技术人造物”的本质回归——论拉图尔对技术本质观的批判与重构  

Back to the Essence of Technical Artifacts:On the Latour's Critique and Reconstruction of the Nature of Technology

作　　者：左璜[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州510631

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2014年第6期41-47,共7页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：全国教育科学"十二五"规划2013年度教育部青年课题(EIA130417);中国博士后面上资助基金项目(2013M531858)成果

摘　　要：已有关于技术人造物的本质认识主要存在客体和工具两种隐喻,始终囿于自然与社会、人与物的二元对立思维传统。基于反二元论的立场,拉图尔依托对现代性的批判与符号学思想,提出了技术人造物的行动者网络隐喻。立足行动者网络隐喻,拉图尔提出了"实作论"以还原技术人造物的历史质,创新"技术解释学"以还原技术人造物的关系质。There are two types of metaphors to represent the essence of technical artifacts. They are object and instrument based on the dualism between nature and society, human and non-humans. From a standpoint against dualism, Latour proposed the new metaphor as actor-network to represent the technical artifacts by means of criticizing modern constitution and reconstructing new conception. At the basis of actor-network metaphor Latour developed the Pragmatogony to uncover the historical essence of technical artifacts and created the Hermeneutics of Technology to reinterpretate the relational essence of it.

关 键 词：技术人造物 隐喻 行动者网络 实作论 技术解释学 正本 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]