检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苟朝莉[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆工商大学,重庆400067
出 处:《国家教育行政学院学报》2014年第6期14-18,共5页Journal of National Academy of Education Administration
摘 要:高校的治理模式是一个长期争论的学术话题,而教授主导或参与高校治理则是数百年以来高校治理的传统。当前,应充分认识到大学事务已经发生了很大变化,对教授治理学校和校长人选的要求已不同于以往。当前中国高校治理的理性模式选择是建立校长与教授共治的模式,主要通过教授委员会的建立和各层级行政机构与学术机构的交叉联系得以实现。The governance model of colleges and universities is a long-standing topic for debates. Professors' dominance or participation in university governance has been a tradition for hundreds of years. Currently, we should fully realize that major changes have taken place in university affairs, the situation of professors' administration and the requirements for president candidates are quite different from those of the past. The author holds that the rational model for university governance is to establish the joint governance between professors and presidents in China, which can be achieved professors and cross-linking between the administrative departments levels. by establishing the committee of and the academic institutes at alllevels.
分 类 号:G647[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117