机构地区:[1]上海交通大学附属新华医院神经内科,200092
出 处:《中华神经科杂志》2014年第6期370-374,共5页Chinese Journal of Neurology
基 金:上海市卫生局青年科研项目(2010Y049);上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金(jdy10111);上海市级医院联合社区开展性病综合防治项目(SHDC12012320)
摘 要:目的:选用Sniffin’ Sticks方法评价帕金森病患者的嗅觉功能情况及影响因素,比较Sniffin’ Sticks方法和味道识别在帕金森病识别方面的优劣性。方法采用Sniffin’ Sticks方法,比较68例帕金森病患者和76名健康志愿者的嗅觉功能,分析年龄、病程、统一帕金森病评分量表分值、Hoehn-Yahr ( H-Y)分级、认知功能水平(蒙特利尔认知评估量表)与嗅觉的相关性。结果(1) Sniffin’ Sticks方法显示,帕金森病组嗅觉障碍发生率为83.8%(57/68),高于对照组的21.1%(16/76)。帕金森病患者的嗅觉总分[(19.6±8.2)分]明显低于健康对照组[(31.0±5.8)分,t=9.694,P=0.000],嗅觉阈值得分[(6.6±3.2)分]明显低于健康对照组[(10.7±2.3)分,t=6.834, P=0.000]、味道辨别得分[(6.6±3.3)分]明显低于健康对照组[(9.9±2.5)分,t =6.834,P =0.000]、16种味道识别得分[(6.8±2.4)分]也明显低于健康对照组[(10.3±1.9)分, t=9.658,P=0.000]。(2)在帕金森病与健康对照组识别方面,Sniffin’ Sticks 方法的敏感度是0.897,特异度是0.737(曲线下面积=0.891),与16种味道识别方法相近,与嗅觉阈值和味道辨别相比占优。(3)帕金森病患者的嗅觉总分与认知功能呈正相关(r=0.243,P=0.046),与年龄、性别、病程、病情严重程度无关;健康对照组的嗅觉总分与年龄呈负相关(r=-0.270,P=0.018),与认知功能呈正相关(r=0.281,P=0.014)。结论帕金森病患者嗅觉障碍发生率较高,嗅觉功能受损较为全面;Sniffin’ Sticks方法在帕金森病患者嗅觉功能定量和定性分析方面优于16种味道识别。在帕金森病识别方面,两种方法均具有较高的敏感度和特异度。Objective To evaluate the olfactory function and its influence factors by using Sniffin ’ Sticks test, and to compare the quality of Parkinson ’s disease (PD) recognition between Sniffin’ Sticks and 16 kinds of odor identification in Sniffin ’ Sticks(SS-16) tests.Methods The Sniffin’Sticks test was used to assess the olfactory function of 68 PD patients and 76 healthy volunteers , and the relationship between smell and age, disease duration, Unified Parkinson’ s Disease Rating Scale score, Hoehn-Yahr (H-Y) rating, and cognitive function level (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) was analyzed.Results (1)The prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in PD group (83.3%) was significantly higher than that in control group (21.2%).The Sniffin’ Sticks test showed that the odor threshold score (6.6 ±3.2, P=0.000), odor discrimination score (6.6 ±3.3, P=0.000), 16 kinds of odor identification score (6.8 ±2.4, P=0.000) in PD group were significantly lower than those in control group.( 2 ) When comparing the PD cases and healthy controls in recognition , the sensitivity and the specificity of the Sniffin ’ Sticks test were 0.897 and 0.737, respectively, similar to the SS-16 test.However, the Sniffin’ Sticks test showed advantage compared with odor threshold and odor discrimination.( 3 ) The olfactory score in PD group was positively correlated with cognitive function (r=0.243, P=0.046), and was unrelated with age, gender, disease duration, and disease severity.The olfactory score in control group was negatively correlated with age (r=-0.270, P=0.018), but positively correlated with cognitive function (r=0.281, P=0.014).Conclusions There is a higher incidence of olfactory dysfunction in PD patients than in control group.Sniffin’ Sticks test is superior to SS-16 test in quantitative and qualitative analysis of olfactory function in PD patients.Two tests both have high sensitivity and specificity in the recognition of PD .
分 类 号:R742.5[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...