韩非的学术突围及迷失——以师事荀子为出发点  

Hanfei's Academic Breakthrough and Loss

作　　者：甄洪永[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西师范大学戏曲文物研究所,山西临汾041004

出　　处：《武陵学刊》2014年第3期21-25,共5页Journal of Wuling

基　　金：山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究项目"明初经学思想研究"(2011GX05)

摘　　要：儒墨显学给韩非带来巨大学术压力,为了证明儒墨之学的愚诬,韩非设定了两条检验标准。在这两条标准之下,韩非必须通过师事荀子才能论证法家思想的合理性,因此,韩非师事荀子具有一定的必然性。韩非与荀子共同遏制墨家"兼爱说",客观上实现了儒法的短暂学术结盟。韩非对孔子进行"法家化"处理,强化了法家存在的合理性,至此,韩非完成对儒墨的学术突围。基于对人性的不同理解,在解决人性本质与资源占有矛盾的问题上儒墨法各具特色。儒家倡导即凡入圣的生活,墨子提倡超凡入圣的生活,而韩非则主张按照丛林法则像动物一样地生活。韩非"去仁爱",舍弃了"仁爱"的差等原则,导致其在"爱"与"恨"的权衡中迷失了方向。The Confucianism and Mohism brought pressure to Hanfei. He set two standards in order to prove the Confucianism and Mohism are stupid. Hanfei must take Xunzi as his master to prove the reasonability of the Legalism. Hanfei and Xunzi became the academic alliance to suppress the Mohism. Hanfei dressed Confucianism with a legalism ~oat to strengthen the reasonability of the Legalism. And he made academic breakthrough by this. Because of different understandings about human nature, the Confucianism, Mohism and Legalism had different ways to solve the contradiction between human nature and resource occupation. In the Confucianism, all the people live as the human. In the Mohism, all the people live as the God. In the legalism, all the people live as the ruthless beast. Hanfei gave up benevolence and love and lost in the balance between hate and love.

关 键 词：韩非 学术突围 人性 资源分配 迷失 

分 类 号：B226.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]