检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏师范大学商学院,徐州221116 [2]江苏师范大学教育学部,徐州221116
出 处:《教育与经济》2014年第3期26-31,43,共7页Education & Economy
基 金:江苏省新世纪高等教育改革工程研究课题"高校与企业合作培养人才研究"(课题批准号:J420)
摘 要:高等教育经费短缺一直是人们普遍关注的话题。比较国外公立高校教育经费投入模式可以发现,不同国家的投入模式有所不同,同一国家的公立高校投入模式也有所差异。而我国无论是计划体制下的"一元化"模式还是市场经济下的"二元化"模式,不同地区、不同类别高校的经费投入模式都未能体现差异性。为了从根本上解决我国公立高校教育经费不足问题,本文从高校所属类别的视角,提出不同类型高校教育经费应采用不同的投入模式,即中央部属高校可沿用现有的中央投入为主、家庭或个人投入为辅的模式,省属高校可采用政府、家庭或个人、企业、社会共同投入的"多元化"模式,市属高校可采用以民间投入为主的模式。The shortage of higher education funds has been the topic of widespread concern. Compared with public education investment model of foreign universities, it finds that different countries have different investment models, and investment models of public universities in the same country also vary. But in China, whether economic system is "unified" mode under the planning system or "duality" model under the market economy, different types of universities in different regions fail to reflect different investment models. In order to fundamentally solve the shortage of public funding of higher education, this article puts forward that different types of colleges and universities should adopt different educational investment modes from the perspective of category of colleges and universities. Namely, the central authorities subordinated colleges and universities can follow the existing model with central authorities mainly investing and family or personal investment supplementing; provincial universities can take diversified mode of co-investment with governments, families or individuals, enterprises and society; municipal colleges and universities can adopt a model of private investment as the mainstay.
分 类 号:F08[经济管理—政治经济学] G40-054[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145