检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]贵州省交通规划勘察设计研究院股份有限公司,贵阳550081
出 处:《公路交通技术》2014年第3期95-99,108,共6页Technology of Highway and Transport
摘 要:以重安江隧道工程为依托,选取3种不同围岩级别的衬砌结构形式进行数值计算,分析衬砌结构内力、安全系数、周边收敛、拱顶下沉、围岩塑性区,并评价衬砌结构的安全性。结果表明:对于Ⅴ、Ⅳ级围岩,拱顶下沉主要是由上台阶及下台阶中央区开挖所致,Ⅴ级围岩地段,围岩塑性区发展很大,甚至发展到地表,Ⅳ级围岩墙脚处塑性区较大;对于Ⅲ级围岩,拱顶下沉则主要是由上台阶开挖所致,围岩塑性区较小。Dependent on the Chonganjiang Tunnel Project, this paper selects lining structure forms at 3 different grades of wall rocks for numerical calculation, analyzes internal force, safety factor, per/pheral convergence, crown settlement of lining structure and plastic zone of wall rocks and evaluates safety of lining structure. The results show that for wall rocks at grades V and IV, crown settlement is mainly caused by excavation of central area of upper and lower steps, the plastic zone of wall rocks develops greatly and even to earth surface, and the plastic zone at the foot of grade IV wall rock is large; for grade In wall rock, crown settlement mainly attributes to excavation of upper step and the plastic zone of wall rock is small.
关 键 词:隧道 衬砌结构 安全系数 周边收敛 拱顶下沉 围岩塑性区
分 类 号:U459.2[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145