两种急救知识和技能培训方法对低年资护士的培训效果影响研究  

Study on the training effect of two different first aid knowledge and skills training methods for junior nurses

作　　者：蒋晓红[1] 李晓锋[1] 叶泽兵[1] 李文浩[1] 覃海森[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省第二人民医院急诊科,广州市510317

出　　处：《护理实践与研究》2014年第6期101-102,共2页Nursing Practice and Research

基　　金：广东省科技计划项目基金(2011B070300085);广东省医学科研基金(A2011132)

摘　　要：目的：通过分析低年资护士急救知识和技能的掌握情况,比较两种不同方法的培训效果。方法：将2011年7月～2013年9月我院255名低年资护士随机分成对照组与观察组,由我院6位专业的BLS/ACLS导师对她们进行急救知识和急救技能的培训,对照组采用传统培训方法,观察组采用AHA培训方法,比较两组急救知识和急救技能掌握情况。结果：两组培训后急救知识和急救技能掌握情况比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：低年资护士急救知识和急救技能总体掌握情况不理想,采用AHA的培训方法,能明显提高其掌握水平,值得推广。Objective：To investigate the first aid knowledge and skills of junior nurses by two different training methods,and compare advantages and disadvantages of training effect.Methods：255 junior nurses（3 years or less） were randomly divided into control group and observation group.Two groups were respectively trained by six BLS /ACLS tutors through traditional（control group） and AHA（American Heart Association） training（observation group） methods.Compared the training effect of two groups before and after training.Results：There was remarkablely difference between two groups after training on first aid knowledge and skills（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：The total level of junior nurses about first aid knowledge and skills are not enough.The AHA training methods can significantly improve the level of first aid knowledge and first aid skills for junior nurses,and it should be promoting.

关 键 词：低年资护士 急救知识 急救技能 培训 美国心脏协会 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]