《说文解字》与《助语辞》虚词对比研究  

A Contrastive Study of Function Words in Shuowenjiezi and Zhuyuci

作　　者：彭再新[1] 

机构地区：[1]南华大学文法学院,湖南衡阳421001

出　　处：《河北科技师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2014年第2期118-123,共6页Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：南华大学社科基金课题"<助语辞>与<说文解字>虚词解释对比研究"(2011XYB20)

摘　　要：在全面考察《说文解字》与《助语辞》两书研究成果以及其研究的理论和方法的基础上,试比较《说文解字》与《助语辞》对虚词的解释,探讨了《助语辞》与《说文解字》在术语、体例、收词、训释方法等方面存在的异同,指出《助语辞》对《说文解字》虚词成果的继承和发扬。虽然两书对虚词的解释研究在词法与语法上存在一些不足,但对语言学的贡献是不可估量的。Based on the achievements as well as theories and methods of the previous studies made on Shuowenjiezi and Zhuyuci,this paper attempts to compare the explanations of function words in both books and probes into the differences in terms,systems,examples,entries and methods of explanation,pointing out that Zhuyuci inherits and develops the achievements of Shuowenjiezi on function words and that some defects in their study on grammar and lexicology,which have made inestimable contributions to Linguistics.

关 键 词：《说文解字》 《助语辞》 虚词 

分 类 号：H021[语言文字—语言学]