检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《济宁医学院学报》2014年第3期218-219,222,共3页Journal of Jining Medical University
基 金:山东省高等学校教学改革项目(2012-377);济宁医学院教学改革项目(2012年)
摘 要:目的探讨PBL教学法在医学机能实验学中应用的效果。方法临床医学专业本科生141人,随机法分为PBL教学法组和传统实验教学法组即对照组,通过满意度调查、实验报告评阅、闭卷考试、操作技能考核,进行教学效果比较。结果 PBL教学法组的实验报告成绩、试卷成绩、技能成绩与对照组相比有显著性差异(P<0.05),对机能学开展PBL教学总体评价满意率89.9%。结论 PBL教学方法在医学机能学实验学中教学效果优于传统教学法。Objective To explore the effect of PBL pedagogics for teaching of medical functional experiment. Methods Undergraduate students of Clinical Medicine Science(141) were randomly divided into PBL group and control group. Data were processed and analyzed by investigating satisfaction, reading and appraising test report, closed-book exam and assessing operating skill. Results Grades of test report, test paper and technical ability in PBL group were significantly different from those in control group (P〈0.05) among the items of experiment reports, closed book examination and operation skills examination. The overall evaluation of satisfaction of PBL rate is 89.9%.Conclusion Effect of PBL to teaching of medical functional experiment pedagogics is better than tradi- tional teaching methods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222