检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]国防科技大学人文与社会科学学院,长沙410074 [2]北京师范大学心理学院,北京100875 [3]湖南第一师范学院教育科学系,长沙410205
出 处:《应用心理学》2014年第1期76-84,共9页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基 金:全国联校教育社科医学研究论文奖计划资助(JY08019)
摘 要:编制区分参照对象的个体主义—集体主义问卷,检验其信度和效度。在文献和实证研究基础上,构建个体主义—集体主义的理论维度,编写问卷条目。先对385名被试实施初测,进行项目分析和探索性因素分析。再对766名被试实施再测,进行结构验证和信度检验。结果发现,区分参照对象的个体主义—集体主义问卷是包含价值选择和行为理念的两维结构,由19个条目组成。该问卷构想效度和信度良好。因此,区分参照对象的个体主义—集体主义问卷可以作为测量个体主义—集体主义的有效工具。The goal of the present study is to develop Individu alismCollectivism Questionnaire with respect to four reference groups and test its reliability and validity. In the 1st survey, the developed IndividualismCol lectivism Questionnaire was adopted to test 385 Sub jects. Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were conducted. In the 2nd survey, the developed In dividualismCollectivism Questionnaire (2nd ver sion) was utilized to test 766 subjects. Structural val idation,reliability test and measurement stability test were conducted. A twofactor model of Individualism Collectivism could be accepted, with the 1st factor"V alue Selection", the 2nd factor "Beliefs", accord ing to all the four reference groups. The developed IndividualismCollectivism Questionnaire, which was composed of 19 items, had adequate psychometric properties as established through item analysis, ex ploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The two factors of the questionnaire and the constructed mod el fit well. Hence,the questionnaire can be used as a tool to assess crosscultural differences.
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222