检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王荫华[1] 陈清棠[1] 张振馨[2] 舒良[3] 姚景莉[4] 余慧贞[5] 张昱[6] 杨期东[7] 赵伟秦[8] 金弘敏[9] 孔凡元[10] 苏炳华[11] 陈峰[11]
机构地区:[1]北京大学第一医院神经内科,100034 [2]中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学北京协和医院神经内科 [3]北京大学精神卫生研究所临床药理研究室 [4]复旦大学医学院附属华山医院神经内科 [5]上海第二医科大学附属瑞金医院神经内科 [6]吉林大学第一医院神经内科 [7]中南大学湘雅医院神经内科 [8]首都医科大学北京友谊医院神经内科 [9]北京回龙观医院 [10]宁夏医学院附属医院 [11]上海第二医科大学生物统计学教研室
出 处:《中华神经科杂志》2001年第4期210-213,共4页Chinese Journal of Neurology
摘 要:目的 评价卡巴拉汀治疗中国轻中度阿尔茨海默病 (AD)患者的有效性和安全性。方法 多中心、随机、开放、对照试验。共有 12 4例 5 0岁以上轻中度AD患者 ,简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)得分在 10~ 2 6分之间 ,并随机分为两组 (卡巴拉汀组和多奈哌齐组各 62例 )。治疗时间 16周。疗效评价使用MMSE量表、Blessed Roth量表和总体衰退量表 (GDS) ,在筛查和 16周末进行。用Hachinski缺血积分量表鉴别AD和血管性痴呆 (VD)。安全性检查包括生命体征、实验室及心电图检查 ,每 4周 1次。结果 两组的人口统计学有可比性 (P >0 0 5 )。两组MMSE、GDS和Blessed Roth评分均有显著改善 (P <0 0 1)。Blessed Roth分值自身对比发现卡巴拉汀组显著改善日常生活能力 (P <0 0 1) ;治疗前后的差值比较也发现卡巴拉汀组在社会活动能力方面稍优于多奈哌齐组 (P =0 0 5 92 )。其他量表指标两组间差异无显著意义 (P >0 0 5 )。总的不良反应率在 12 9%~ 2 8 8%之间 ,两组间无显著差异。药物对病人生命体征及实验室指标无影响。结论 卡巴拉汀可显著改善AD患者的临床症状、且安全性和耐受性良好 ,是AD治疗的理想药物之一。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in treating Chinese patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Methods A multicenter,randomized,open labeled,controlled clinical trial was conducted In this trial,124 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease,aged 50 years or more,scored 10 to 26 on MMSE were enrolled They were assigned to two groups randomly,62 in rivastigmine group and 62 in donepezil group Efficacy was assessed on basis of scores on MMSE,Blessed Roth scale and GDS,at the baseline and at the end of week 16 AD was set to be differentiated from VD by using Hachinski Ischemic Scale Safety was assessed according to vital signs,laboratory test and ECG,once per four weeks. Results Two groups were comparable on demography ( P >0 05) After treatment the scores of the two groups on MMSE,GDS and Blessed Roth Scale were all improved significantly ( P <0 01) By self contrast of the subitems scores on Blessed Roth Scale it revealed rivastigmine could improve the activity of daily life ( P <0 01),but Donepezil couldn't ( P >0 05) With the variances between pre and post treatment comparison,it revealed that rivastigmine had a little better than Donepezil in improving social activity ( P =0 0592) There was no significant difference between the two groups in other indexes of the scales ( P >0 05) The overall incidence of adverse effects was between 12 9% and 28 8% There were no significant differences between these two groups Rivastigmine had no influence on vital signs and laboratory indexes Conclusion Rivastigmine may significantly improve the symptoms of the patient with AD and have a good safety and tolerability,being an ideal choice in treating AD
关 键 词:卡巴拉汀 阿尔茨海默病 胆碱酯抑制剂 临床试验 治疗
分 类 号:R749.161[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30