检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈蜀玉[1]
机构地区:[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都610064
出 处:《西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2002年第2期57-60,共4页Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:在比较文学研究中,除了对象的选择、文本的确立、话语的研究以外,文学研究的方法也是长期困扰比较文学研究者的一大问题。中国传统的格物致知,和西方通用线性研究已很难在后现代时期满足比较文学研究的需要。本文试图从非线性的点和线的角度对割裂性和非延续性进行思考。Although the selection of objects, the choice of texts, and the study of discourses can be regarded as methods in the comparative literature research,the comparative literature methodology remains, from the beginning, an unsolved problem to the comparatists. It seems that the traditional methods of Chinese gewuzhizhi and west linear approach can no longer meet the demands of comparative literature research in the post-modern time. Therefore, this article tries to put the discontinuity and the rupture under consideration from the perspective of un-linear points and lines.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222