检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐葆耕[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学中文系,北京100084
出 处:《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2002年第1期45-50,共6页Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:科技与诗 (艺术 )的关系问题 ,是近代中外学术界十分关注、众说纷纭的问题。瑞恰慈在 2 0世纪 2 0年代 ,发表的《科学与诗》等著作 ,根据当时心理科学方面取得的成果 ,论述了科学发展对诗及诗歌研究的影响。文章以韦勒克对瑞恰慈在这方面的否定性批评为线索 ,试图重新估量瑞恰慈理论的历史与现实价值及其失误。认为 ,关注科技发展对艺术的积极影响是人文学者不可推卸的职责。文章还对《科学与诗》在中国的影响进行了分析 。The relation of science and technology to poetry has been a much- disputed problem that has attracted the attention of academia at home and abroad since the modern times.In his Science and Poetry and other workspublished in the1 92 0 s,I.A.Richardshas discussed,in the lightof contemporary achieve- ments in psychological science,the influence of the development of science and technology upon poetry writing and poetry studies.Following the line of Rene Wellek'snegative criticism of Richard'stheory,this paper attempts to revalue the theory's historical and realistic merits and demerits. The author maintains thatitis humanists'bounden responsibility to directtheir attention to the positive influence of the develop- ment of science and techonology upon arts.In an analysis of the impactof Science and Poetry in China,the paper also points out that it is worth paying close attention to the insufficiency of Chinese academic criti- cism in the respect of metaphysics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171