当事人虚假陈述的认定与规制——以司法裁决为中心的考察  

The Cognizance and Regulation of the False Statement of the Parties——A Review Centered on Judicial Decisions

作　　者：熊跃敏[1] 陈亢睿 Xiong Yuemin;Chen Kangrui(School of Law,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第6期74-81,共8页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：民事诉讼当事人的虚假陈述增加了法官正确认定案件事实的难度,易导致法官误判。对此,司法实践已出现认定与规制当事人虚假陈述的裁决。但由于当事人虚假陈述内涵模糊、法律规定有限以及认定的难度与成本较高,导致法院对虚假陈述的处理较为消极。为进一步规制当事人虚假陈述,需要重塑当事人陈述的地位与功能,即以询问当事人作为获取证据性陈述的手段,并苛以真实陈述义务。在此基础上,厘清当事人虚假陈述的构成要件与规制方式,并将宣誓制度设定为询问当事人的前置程序。In civil litigation,the false statement of the parties increases the difficulty for the judge to correctly determine the facts of the case,which may lead to the judge's misjudgment. In this regard,the judicial practice has a ruling that identifies and regulates the false statement of the parties.However,due to the ambiguous connotation of the misrepresentation,the limited legal provisions and the difficulty and high cost of the cognizance,the court's handling of false statements is relatively negative.In order to further regulate the false statements of the parties,it is necessary to reshape the position and function of the parties' statements,that is,to inquire the parties as a means to obtain evidenced statements,and to remind the parties of their obligations on true statements.On this basis,the constituent elements of the parties'false statements and regulatory methods can be clarified,and the oath system can be set as the pre-procedure of inquiring the parties.

关 键 词：当事人陈述 虚假陈述 询问当事人 真实义务 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]