《九辩》乃“汉人的作品”说驳议——兼论“用汉语词汇史鉴定古籍时代”之适用度问题  

The Refutation of "Nine Debates is the Work in Han Dynasty"——the Issues of Applicability in Identifying the Creation Time of Ancient Books Through the History of Chinese Vocabulary

作　　者：周春艳 ZHOU Chun-yan(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 541006,China)

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541006

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第6期132-137,共6页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：《九辩》之作者,就《楚辞》之成书体例考察,其为宋玉无疑,其他说法本无再行研讨之必要。然自孙楷第后,近来何金松运用汉语词汇史鉴定古籍时代之法考察"屈作"及"疑屈作"《九辩》,重申"汉代作者说"。但就古籍保存及地域差异、作家身份及文体差异与文学作品语言风格三大角度考察可知,此法适用度已被过度放大。"汉代作者说"无以成立;何先生以此法所考的结果,几均存在着进一步商榷之空间。According to thecomplication style of Chu Ci (the lyrical ballads),it has been proved that the Nine Debates is authored by Song Yu.Thus,it is unnecessary to make a further study about it.Following Sun Kaidi,however,recently,He Jingshong reaffirmed such opinion that "Nine Debates is the work of the Han Dynasty".With the application of the history of .Chinese character to identify the time of the ancient works,Mr.He made an investigation about whether the author of Nine Debates (the lyrical poem) is Qu yuan.However,in terms of the preservation of ancient books and geographical differences,the identity of writers and their literary styles,as well as the language style in their literature,it can be found that he overestimated the applicability of this method.Therefore,the opinion about "Nine Debates is the Work of the Han Dynasty"is unacceptable.Also,the conclusion made by Mr.He in such method,at a great extent,still needs further analysis and discussion.

关 键 词：《九辩》 汉代 汉语词汇史 古籍时代 适用度 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]