“人之死”的路径与归宿:福柯与庄子的比较  

The pathway and destination of "Man passed away" -- A comparison of Foucault and Zhuang Zi

作　　者：陈喜辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨工业大学,黑龙江哈尔滨150001

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2002年第2期77-81,共5页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：黑龙江省自然科学基金资助项目 (G0 1-0 9)

摘　　要：“人死了”是福柯的重要命题 ,而庄子也有类似的思想。二者并不完全对应 ,福柯的涵义是“主体性”的瓦解 ,庄子的重点是人的“自然性”的扭曲。但他们批判的目标是一致的 :“人”被制造和规训。而使人异化的力量 ,对福柯来说 ,是权力 /知识 ,对庄子来说 ,是有为 /礼教。这违背了人的本性 ,所以福柯与庄子都鼓励从中脱逃 ,变成自由的个体。但福柯的个体是无主的欲望 。Man passed away', is Foucault's important proposition and shared by Zhuang Zi to certain extent, but not completely corresponding. Foucault's idea is the disintegration of the subjectivity, while Zhuang Zi focused on the distortion of the spontaneousness. But the aim of what they had animadverted is the same: man has been made and educated, the power which dissimilates human is power /knowledge to Foucault, but you-wei/ethics to Zhuang Zi, which is regarded as against the nature of human, so both Foucault and Zhuang Zi encouraged humans to break away from it, and try to be individualized. But the difference is that Foucault's individualization is a derelict desire, while Zhuang Zi`s is a return to nature.

关 键 词：主体 规训 死亡 归宿 

分 类 号：B223[哲学宗教—中国哲学]