中日两国行人保护法规对比  

Comparison of Pedestrian Protection Regulations between China and Japan

作　　者：张大伟[1] 吕晓江[1] 孙立志[1] 周大永[1,2] 刘卫国[1,2] 冯擎峰[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江吉利汽车研究院有限公司 [2]浙江省汽车安全技术研究重点实验室

出　　处：《汽车工程师》2014年第7期13-14,20,共3页Automotive Engineer

基　　金：浙江省汽车安全技术研究重点实验室建设项目(2009E10013)

摘　　要：为完善中国行人保护法规,文章对比了日本TRIAS 18-J099(2)-1和中国GB/T24550-2009的碰撞区域、试验工况及伤害指标等。分析结果表明:TRIAS 18-J099(2)-1定义的发动机罩前缘基准线与GB/T 24550-2009不同,存在儿童头部碰撞区域缩小情况;TRIAS 18-J099(2)-1增加了柔性腿型碰撞工况,在防止行人下肢伤害方面要优于GB/T 24550-2009。因此,建议中国行人保护法规包含柔性腿型测试内容。To improve the Chinese pedestrian protection regulation, the comparison between TRIAS 18-J099 （2）-1 of Japan and GB/T24550-2009 of China on impact area, test condition and injury index is made. The test results show that the definition of bonnet leading edge reference line is different between two regulations, the child head impact area in TRIAS 18-J099 （2）-1 is smaller and because of the addition of flexible legform test condition, TRIAS 18-J099 （2）-1 is superior to GB/T24550-2009 in protecting pedestrian legs. Therefore, flexible legform test should be included in Chinese pedestrian protection regulation.

关 键 词：汽车安全 行人保护 法规 头部碰撞 腿部碰撞 

分 类 号：U462[机械工程—车辆工程]