检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学管理学院 [2]北京师范大学政府管理学院
出 处:《中国人力资源开发》2014年第17期50-58,共9页Human Resources Development of China
摘 要:本研究以某证券公司28个工作团队的148名员工为样本,考察了个体与团队工作价值观差异对流动倾向与工作绩效的影响机制。结果表明:价值观由尊重认可、胜任发展、舒适安全三个维度构成,员工敬业度由心理投入、意义获得两个维度构成;价值观的尊重认可差异、胜任发展差异显著负向影响工作绩效,心理投入起完全中介作用;价值观的尊重认可差异显著正向影响流动倾向,心理投入起到部分中介作用;价值观的舒适安全差异对工作绩效和流动倾向的作用并不显著。研究对组织中团队成员选拔、员工敬业度提升以及知识型员工自我职业生涯管理等方面具有一定的理论和实践意义。This study explores the effects of the value gap between individual and team on their job performance and turnover inclination. Results showed three dimensions composed values (respect and recognition, comfort and safe, competency and development), and two dimensions composed engagement (psychological involvement end available); respect and recognition of the gap between individual end team values has positive effect on turnover inclination, and psychological safe partly mediates; Respect and recognition of the gap between individual and team values has negative effect on performance, and psychological safe fully mediates; Competency and development of the gap between individual and team values has negative effect on performance, and psychological safe fully mediates; The effects of comfort and safe of the gap between individual and team values is not significant; Values gap does not affect the psychological meaning and availability. This study has significant theoretical and practical significance on teem member selection in organizstians, employee engagement promotion and career management of knowledge workers themselves.
关 键 词:个体与团队价值观差异 流动倾向 工作绩效 员工敬业度
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30