检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院,乌鲁木齐830011
出 处:《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》2014年第17期2595-2596,共2页Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
基 金:新疆医科大学教育改革项目(YG2013097)
摘 要:目的探讨基于问题式的教学模式(PBL)和传统讲授式教学模式(LBL)在胸部肿瘤外科临床实习学生带教中的效果。方法选择2013级新疆医科大学厚博学院5年制临床医学专业的两个不同班级作为研究对象,其中一个班级有学生46人,按PBL教学模式给予带教,另外一个班级有学生43人,按传统LBL教学模式给予带教,实习结束后进行2个班级学生实习效果的比较。结果 PBL教学模式班级学生发现问题、解决问题、专业知识掌握、临床技能掌握及医患关系和医护关系处理方面的成绩均优于传统LBL教学模式班级。结论 PBL教学模式不仅能够提高学生的学习成绩和能力,同时还能增强学生的临床操作技能,值得在胸部肿瘤外科临床实习带教中推广应用。Objective To investigate the effectiveness of PBL teaching pattern and LBL one on interns in clinical practice of thoracic oncological surgery. Methods Two different classes of clinical medical specialty in Xinjiang Medical University were selected as study target. The class with 46 students accepted PBL teaching pattern (Problem-based learning group) and the other class with 43 students accepted LBL teaching pattern (Lecture-based learning group ). The effectiveness of these two different teaching group were compared. Results Those average scores of problem-finding, problem-solving, specific knowledge understanding, clinical skills applying, doctor-patient relationship treating and doctor-nurse relationship treating in PBL group are significantly higher than those of LBL group. Conclusions The teaching pattern of PBL can improve the effectiveness of medical student's learning in the clinical practice of thoracic oncological surgery, enhance their capability of patients treatment. The PBL teaching method in practice of thoracic oncologieal surgery has certain promotion value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249