儒学复兴:从“幽灵”走向“精神”——基于历史唯物主义方法论的尝试性勘定  

Revival of Confucianism:From “Ghost” to “Spirit”——A Tentative Understanding Based on Methodology of Historical Materialism

作　　者：孙亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学哲学系,上海200241

出　　处：《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第5期5-12,共8页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(12CZX009);教育部人文社科基金项目(12YJC720029)

摘　　要：面对未经勘察的儒学复兴与重建,我们需要警惕重蹈儒学意识形态建构的"旧路",以及"人的依赖性社会"向"物的依赖性社会"的转型问题。思考儒学之于当下意义,可资借鉴马克思的"幽灵"与"精神"的异质性诠释路径。摆脱"死人纠缠活人"的幽灵性面对儒学的姿态,转而以一种面向未来的"精神"审理儒学之价值当为必要。而一旦认识到当下中国问题乃全球化之一种,便懂得,"中国思想"的生成必须要能够对个体、类以及多元共同体有一个清晰的"说理"。学界不能以"学术创新"而应以"中国社会现实"为重,这要求学界在处理儒学与西方哲学以及马克思主义之间的思想关系的前提下开启未来的"中国思想"。Facing the Confucianism revival and reconstruction, it is better not to go along with the “old way” of Confucian construction, but with a deep concern of the social transformation from the “dependence to human” to the “dependence to things”. In consideration of the realistic significance of Confucianism, it is better to refer to Marx＇s“ghost” and “spirit”, get rid of the ghost attitude in treating Confucianism, and absorb its value and spirit. Currently, if the Chinese problems are recognized as those inherent in globalization, the formation of the “Chinese thought”can be understood as the justification of individuals, species and multiple communities. It is better to combine Confucianism, western philosophy with Marxist thought, if China wants to have an aspiration to open the future of “Chinese thought ”itself.

关 键 词：儒学复兴 马克思 幽灵 精神 勘定 

分 类 号：B222[哲学宗教—中国哲学]