中国古典美学诗性化特征的理论辩护  

Theoretical Defense on Poetic Characteristic of Chinese Classical Aesthetics

作　　者：张奎志[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学文学院,教授黑龙江哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《学术月刊》2014年第10期122-127,共6页Academic Monthly

摘　　要：中国古代一直以感悟式的、诗性化的方式谈论美学,由此也给人留下了中国古典美学缺乏逻辑性和体系性的印象。事实上,依据洛克对事物"第一性质"和"第二性质"的划分,"美"作为一种存在具有非确定性特征,是无法用实证的方法来验证的;若根据狄尔泰对"精神科学"和"自然科学"研究方法的区别,则美学作为"精神科学",实无法采用逻辑分析的研究方法;而依照海德格尔对"存在"和"存在者"要用不同的言说方式,那么论述中国古典美学的概念也无法采用逻辑定义的方法言说。由此看出,西方已有人认识到了对"美"和"美学"要采用不同的研究方法和言说方式,这就为解释中国古典美学的诗性化言说方式找到了理论依据,从而说明中国古典美学的诗性化特征不是缺点,反倒表现了其对"美"和美学学科的深刻认识。People discuss aesthetics in the way of comprehension style and poetic in ancient China, and then causes the impression that Chinese classical aesthetics lacks logicality and systematic. This paper illustrates that ＂beauty＂ as a kind of existence has non deterministic characteristic and can＇t test and verify from empirical method according to Rock＇s division of things＇ ＂the first nature＂ and ＂the second nature＂. This paper also elaborates that aesthetics as ＂mental science＂ can＇t adopt research methods of logical analysis according to Dilthey＇s difference of research methods of ＂mental science＂ and ＂natural science＂. This paper even more expounds that the concepts of Chinese classical aesthetics can＇t adopt the method of logic definition to speech according to Heidegger＇s idea that ＂Being＂ and ＂beings＂ should use different speech mode. Therefore we could see that there have been people recognize which people should adopt different research method and speech mode to ＂beauty＂ and ＂aesthetics＂, and then finds theoretical basis for explaining poetic speech mode of Chinese classical aesthetics. Thus we can explain that poetic characteristic of Chinese classical aesthetics is not weakness and instead shows its profound understanding to ＂beauty＂ and discipline of aesthetics.

关 键 词：中国古典美学 诗性化 体系性 

分 类 号：B83[哲学宗教—美学]