中英德法俄美食品标准现状对比分析  

Comparison and Analysis of Food Standard Documents at Home and Abroad

作　　者：刘春卉[1] 计雄飞[1] 汪滨[1] 赵奇[1] 李波[1] 旻苏[1] 滕慧玲[1] 李燕[1] 于志勇[1] 王静雅[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国标准化研究院国家标准馆,北京100191

出　　处：《中国农学通报》2014年第27期293-298,共6页Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

基　　金：国家"十二五"科技支撑计划项目"支撑国际突破与国际贸易的重要国际标准研究"(2012BAK28B04);国家质检总局中国标准化研究院基本科研业务费项目"面向企业的标准文献专题分析研究"(252013Y-3060)

摘　　要：通过研究为中国食品领域未来的国家标准制修订工作提供决策依据,为食品领域标准制修订、发布活动和标准化发展趋势提供风向标,为建立协调一致的食品安全标准体系提供知识服务支撑。基于文献计量学的方法从标准数量、标龄、发布年代、采标率、采标一致性程度、采标及时性等多个方面,将英、德、法、俄、美5个国家食品领域的现行标准文献与中国现行标准文献进行对比分析。结果表明中国现行食品国家标准总数为2242项;5年以下标龄的标准百分比仅次于美国;标龄3~5年的现行标准比例较高;标准发布高峰期在2009年;中国食品标准的技术领域主要分布在农产食品综合、食品试验和分析的一般方法以及食品添加剂等,建议加强乳和乳制品、食品加工器具、包装材料和设备等标准研制;中国食品标准的国际标准采标率相对较低,仅为18.02%;采标一致性程度较其他几国低;采标时效性不高,采用近5年的国际标准数量较少,建议缩短采标时间差。This article aims to lay a good basis for decision-making for the development and revision of future standards. The bibliometric analysis results can be taken as the indications for the development, revision and distribution of standards as well as future trend of standardization. This article based on bibliometric analysis, the national food standards of foreign countries, including Britain, Germany, France, Russia, the United States, and China are thoroughly compared and analyzed in terms of the quantity, standard age, publication date, technical field and adoption rate of international standards. The results showed that, in China, the amount of active food standards was 2242; the percentage of standard age less than 5 years ranked only second to the United States; the publication peak of food standards was 2009. The technical fields of food standards in China were mainly distributed in food products in general, methods of tests and analysis for food products, and food additives, etc. The standard numbers of some food technical fields, for example, milk and milk products, materials and articles in contact with foodstuffs, plants and equipment for the food industry, should be increased. The domestic adoption percentage of international standards was relatively low, merely 18.02%. The consistency extent of standards was lower than that of other countries. The standard timeliness was not high, and the number of adoption of international standards issued within 5 years was relatively few, therefore, it is recommended to shorten the time difference of adoption of international standards.

关 键 词：文献计量学 食品安全 国家标准 比较 

分 类 号：TS3[轻工技术与工程]