检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北工业大学自动化学院,陕西西安710072
出 处:《计算机仿真》2014年第10期48-51,85,共5页Computer Simulation
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51107100);陕西省自然科学基金(2011GQ7001)
摘 要:在飞机防滑刹车控制优化的研究中,针对飞机防滑刹车系统的非线性、时变和不确定性,从相对滑移率出发,推导了关于闭环PI型迭代学习控制算法的防滑刹车系统模型;利用粒子群算法对迭代控制中的PI参数进行在线实时更新。在参数保持一致的情况下,以matlab7.1为仿真平台、飞机减速率为目标函数,对系统进行仿真与分析,并与传统的PMB+PID算法进行了比较。仿真结果表明,方法效果明显优于PBM+PID算法,证明了ntfj算法在控制性能上的正确性、优越性,对飞机刹车系统优化设计提供了很好的理论依据。Due to the features of non - linearity, time - variety and uncertainty of aircraft anti - skid braking sys- tem, starting from the relative slip rate, a model of aircraft anti - skid braking system was derived based on closed - loop PI iterative learning control algorithm and the algorithm of Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO) which updates PI parameters of iterative control online and real - time. In the case of the same parameters, taken matlab7. 1 as the simulation platform and the aircraft deceleration rate as the objective function, the system was simulated and the re- sults wer compared with the algorithm of PMB + PID. The simulation results show that the method adopted in the pa- per is obviously better than the algorithm of PMB + PID. Both the correctness and superiority of the algorithm control characteristic are proved. Simultaneously the method provides good theoretical references for the optimal design for aircraft brake system.
分 类 号:V271.4[航空宇航科学与技术—飞行器设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200