检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南交通职业技术学院,湖南长沙410132 [2]湖南交通科学研究院,湖南长沙410015
出 处:《公路工程》2014年第5期220-223,共4页Highway Engineering
摘 要:高速隧道特大溶洞在施工过程中一直存在大面积塌方,腔壁不稳定等问题。根据广西河池至都安高速谢家峒一特大溶洞的实际情况及安全经济的原则,针对全断面回填泵送砼反开挖法、直接回填混合料反开挖法、斜井回填混合料反开挖法及整体钢架台车支护法四种施工方案,进行了风险评估、可行性及经济性比较。综合对比表明:泵送素混凝土回填反开挖的方案为首选方案。During High speed tunnel construction,super-huge kars was met. Because it's cavity wall was instable,it needed reinforcing. According to the actual situation,safe and economic principles,the four kinds of construction methods were put forward. They were the full cross section of backfilling pumping concrete anti excavation method,direct backfill mix the excavation method,slope backfill mix the excavation method and integral steel trolley supporting method. The four kinds of scheme were compared from risk assessment,feasibility and economic. Comprehensive comparison showed pumping concrete backfill back excavation scheme was preferred.
分 类 号:U456.3[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.146.235