实在论、反实在论与准实在论——当代西方解释休谟因果观的三种立场  

Realism,Anti-Realism and Quasi-Realism:Three Positions on the Interpretation of Hume's View of Causation

作　　者：铁省林[1] 

机构地区：[1]曲阜师范大学政治与公共管理学院,日照276826

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2014年第12期10-15,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

摘　　要：围绕着休谟是否承认外部世界中存在着因果关系这个问题,当代西方休谟研究者形成了三种立场:实在论、反实在论与准实在论。实在论者认为休谟是一位因果实在论者,休谟主张外部世界中存在着因果力量和必然联系,对休谟的因果观作出了新的解释;反实在论者坚持传统的观点,从休谟的观念理论及其复现原则出发论证了休谟否认客观因果关系的存在;而准实在论者则试图调和实在论与反实在论之争,以投射论来说明休谟的因果观介于实在论与反实在论之间。实在论、反实在论与准实在论都缺乏根本的说服力,但其探索和争论深化了人们对休谟因果观的研究和理解,推动了休谟哲学的研究。There are three different positions on the question about whether Hume acknowledges causation in the world ： realism, anti - realism and quasi - realism. Realists regard Hume as a causation realist, that Hume advocates there are causation power and necessary connection, which is a new interpre- tation ; according to Hume＇ s theory of idea and its copy principle, anti - realists who adhere to traditional view, argument that Hume denies there is objective causation; quasi -realists attempt to reconcile the debate between realism and anti -realism, using prejectivism to account to Hume＇ s view. Real- ism, anti - realism and quasi - realism are short of fundamental persuasion, but their exploring and debate among has deepened the study and understanding about Hume＇ s view of causation, and drived the research of Hume＇ s philosophy.

关 键 词：实在论 反实在论 准实在论 因果 

分 类 号：B561.291[哲学宗教—外国哲学]