检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄再胜[1]
出 处:《湖北经济学院学报》2014年第6期60-67,共8页Journal of Hubei University of Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(2010CGL056)
摘 要:本文基于股东间代理问题视角,利用2007~2011年我国A股上市公司数据,实证考察了高管薪酬的过度支付是否会成为控股股东实现控制权私利的一种路径。研究发现:在地方国企中,高管薪酬水平与控股股东的现金流权显著负相关,与控股股东控制权与现金流权的两权分离度显著正相关,但这一结论在央企和民营企业中均不成立。这表明地方国企高管薪酬决定存在明显的掏空效应。本文的研究结论对于深化国企高管薪酬管理制度改革具有政策启示涵义。From the Perspective of principal-principal agency problem, this paper empirically analyses whether there exist the tunneling effect in the determination of CEO compensation of Chinese Listed Companies. We find that there is a signifi-cant negative relationship between controlling shareholder's cash flow right and the level of CEO compensation, while the wedge between control right and cash flow right of controlling shareholder has a significant positive effect on the level of CEO compensation in local government controlled firms. But such relationships do not exit in both central government controlled firms and privately owned firms. These findings have policy implications for the reform of SOEs' executive compensation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222