检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石淑霞[1] 陈命家 郭毅[1] 郭彦[1] 李和林[1] 李丽[1]
出 处:《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》2014年第22期3371-3373,共3页Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
基 金:安徽省级质量工程项目(297);校级质量工程项目(高职高专康复治疗技术专业实用型人才培养模式的研究;创新和实践)
摘 要:目的探讨高职高专康复专业"1+1+1"教学模式改革下物理治疗学教学方法改革的成效。方法将2012级康复治疗技术专业1班设为对照组(n=48),采用传统教学模式,2班为实验组(n=45),接受"1+1+1"教学模式改革。学期结束后,比较两组的理论及实验考核成绩,并对两组学生进行问卷调查。结果实验组理论考核及实验考核成绩均优于对照组(P<0.05),问卷调查显示实验组对教学方法的好评率高于对照组。结论 "1+1+1"教学模式改革下物理治疗学教学方法改革有助于提升学生学习效果,且改革后的教学方法更易被学生认可和接受。Objective To explore the reforming effectiveness of physiotherapy teaching under the"1+1+1"teaching mode in rehabilitation major of vocational colleges.Methods No 1 class of 2012 rehabilitation technology major was defined as control group ( n=48 ) , No 2 as experimental group ( n=45 ) .The traditional teaching mode was used in control group, while "1 +1 +1"teaching model reforming was implemented in experimental group.On the ending of semester, comparison of the theoretical and experimental test results between the two groups were carried out respectively, a questionnaire survey conducted as well.Results The experimental group gained better results both in theoretical and experimental assessments than the control group ( P〈0.05 ) .Greater satisfaction at teaching mode existed in the experimental group than the control group. Conclusions At the atmosphere of "1 +1 +1"teaching model reforming, physiotherapy teaching reforming enhances the effectiveness of learning. Teaching mode after reforming is more likely to be recognized and accepted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3