“最后之神”即海德格尔的基督?  

Is "Der letzte Gott" Heidegger's Christ?

作　　者：林子淳[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学人文学院 [2]香港汉语基督教文化研究所

出　　处：《世界哲学》2015年第1期62-71,160,共10页World Philosophy

摘　　要：在海德格尔的《哲学论稿》中,"最后之神"是篇幅最短却又极关键的部分,向来惹人遐思又令人却步。塞杜尔在比较了其他著作之后,指出《哲学论稿》承载着海德格尔的基督论,而且目的就是"最后之神"。本文首先引述这个具有争议性的看法,从《哲学论稿》的遣词用语、论证内容出发,并与相关思想家如布尔特曼和谢林作比较,指出海德格尔确曾受他们启发,但也显示出思想上的差异。接着,本文从更宽阔的海德格尔的思想发展脉络来评估其神学关怀,并指出以神学方式阅读海德格尔及其现代状况的意义。《哲学论稿》和同期作品反映出了一位当代西方思想家在面对现代转向时如何试图建构一种圣俗交织的现代话语。传统基督教义虽有参考意义,却未能完全处理其中问题,而纯粹哲学又难以处理神圣问题而陷入失语,故比较进路或许能对这种现代状况提供出路。In Heidegger's Beitrge zur Philosophie, 'der letzte Gott' is the shortest but critical section,often arousing scholars' interest but obscurities.In comparison with other works,George Seidel suggests that Beitrage zur Philosophie contains Heidegger's christology and is spoken with respect to 'der letzte Gott'.First,this article introduces this controversial perspective.From the terms used in this work and the related contents,we find that Heidegger is probably inspired by thinkers like Bultmann and Schelling.But at the same time he also shows differences from their thoughts.Then this article examines Heidegger's thought from a broader developmental context to assess his theological concerns and noting the significance of reading Heidegger theologically against the modern condition.We can see that Beitrage zur Philosophie and his works of the same period is a discourse produced by a contemporary Western thinker in face of the modern turn.Thus traditional Christian doctrine is still its important reference but failed to complete his task.Philosophical discourse is also speechless when dealing with the issue of sacred in the shadow of secularization.Therefore a comparative approach may be a good means.

关 键 词：海德格尔 《哲学论稿》 布尔特曼 谢林 观念论 神学 

分 类 号：B516.54[哲学宗教—外国哲学]