浅论犯罪阻却事由与犯罪构成的关系  

Some Opinions on Relationship between Cause of Justification and Constitution of Crimes

作　　者：李宏杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2014年第3期51-54,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：在犯罪构成理论的研究中,其与犯罪阻却事由之间的关系是一个备受瞩目的重要论题。直接原因是,在我国传统犯罪构成理论中,犯罪阻却事由处于一种"流离失所"的状态,导致一种尴尬的关系于斯产生。从这一关系的重要意义出发,梳理二者关系在传统理论中遭遇到的实然之困局,此基础之上,提出这一对关系应然之走向——在改造犯罪构成理论的基础上,将犯罪阻却事由纳入到犯罪构成理论中去,以此完成这一论题在犯罪构成理论研究中的使命。In the study of crime constitution theory,the relationship between it and cause of justification is an important topic. Direct reason is that in our traditional crime constitution theory,cause of justification is in a state of displaced. Starting from the significance of this relationship,this paper attempts to sort out the dilemma in traditional theory,on this basis,proposed what the relationship ought to be. On the basis of transforming crime constitution theory,cause of justification should be brought into crime constitution theory to complete the mission of this topic.

关 键 词：犯罪构成 犯罪阻却事由 实然 应然 

分 类 号：DF6[政治法律—刑法学]