检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李崎[1] 林静[1] 肖红[1] 马尔丽[1] 梁鹏[1] 石庭伟[1] 方利群[1] 罗朝志[1] 刘进[1]
出 处:《中华医学教育探索杂志》2014年第10期1018-1021,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基 金:四川省教育厅2014年研究生教育改革创新项目(2014-JY-014)
摘 要:目的观察形成性评估对医学生基本生命支持(basic life support,BLS)技能与知识保留的影响。方法237名医学生随机分入对照组(C组,115人)与试验组(F组,122人)。所有学生完成BLS理论大课后,接受BLS理论测试。随后,C组接受技能培训。而F组学生在BLS培训前先接受BLS技能评估。之后,依据F组学生在技能评估中的操作给予反馈,再进行BLS技能培训。两组在培训结束时及培训后1、3、6个月时再次接受BLS技能评估和理论测试。组问成绩比较采用单因素方差分析。结果培训结束时F组技能评估成绩[(85.2±7.3)分]优于C组[(68.2±13.2)分],差异有统计学意义(P=0.00);随访各时间点F组技能评估成绩也均优于C组(P〈0.05)。随访中F组在培训后3个月和6个月时的理论测试成绩优于C组(P〈0.05)。结论形成性评估可以显著改进医学生BLS技能与知识的保留。Objective To investigate the effect of a formative assessment on skill and knowledge retention of basic life support(BLS) in medical students. Methods 237 undergraduate medical students were randomized into the control group(C group)or the interventional group(F group). A BLS lecture was followed by a BLS knowledge assessment in both groups. And then, the C group received BLS training. In the F group, a BLS skill assessment was conducted before training and feedback corresponding to students' error in the skill assessment was given. Then BLS training was followed in the F group. BLS skill and knowledge were assessed immediately after training and at follow up. One- way ANOVA test was used to compare the difference of theory and skill between the two groups. Results Better skill was observed in the F group immediately after training[FO=(85.2±7.3)vs. CO= (68.2±13.2), P=0.00] and at follow up, compared with C group. And better knowledge was observed in the F group at 3 and 6-month after the initial training. Conclusion A formative assessment significantly improved skill and knowledge retention of BLS in medical students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.115.102