归依与反叛:海德格尔政治介入前后对尼采的双重理解  

Conversion and Revolt: Heidegger's Dual Understanding of Nietzsche around His Political Intervention

作　　者：马成昌[1] 

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学哲学系,北京100048

出　　处：《山西师大学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期18-23,共6页Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：海德格尔政治介入前后对尼采哲学有着两种截然不同的理解。他的政治介入植根于其生存论哲学的诸种可能性之中,而这种哲学的可能性更多地来源于尼采。因此,尼采对海德格尔哲学的深刻影响并不是在尼采讲座时期,而是在海德格尔政治介入之前,政治介入本身则是对尼采哲学的彻底归依。而后期讲座则是对尼采哲学的反思与重新定位,表现为对尼采思想的激烈反叛。这种反叛即使不能构成海德格尔尼采讲座的全部主题,但也应视为海德格尔尼采解释的重要一维。Heidegger has fairly different understandings of Nietzsche＇s philosophy around his political interven- tion. His participation is rooted in all kinds of possibilities of his existential philosophy, which results from Nie- tzsche. Therefore, Nietzsche＇s profound influence on Heidegger is not occuring during his lecture, rather it is before his political intervention, which is an absolute conversion to Nietzsche. Subsequent lecture on Nietzsche is a reflec- tion on and relocation of Nietzsche＇s philosophy, showing a fierce rebellion against Nietzsche＇s thought. Even if the revolt cannot consist of all themes on Heidegger＇s lecture of Nietzsche, it is an important dimension on Heidegger＇s interpretation of Nietzsche.

关 键 词：海德格尔 政治介入 尼采 

分 类 号：B505[哲学宗教—外国哲学]