真命题还是伪命题:企业社会责任检验的新思路  

True or False Proposition:A New Thinking about the Testing of CSR

作　　者：肖红军[1] 李伟阳[2] 胡叶琳 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院工业经济研究所,北京100836 [2]国家电网公司高级培训中心,北京100031 [3]北京融智企业社会责任研究所,北京100044

出　　处：《中国工业经济》2015年第2期102-114,共13页China Industrial Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"中国企业社会责任评价与推进机制研究"(批准号12CGL039)

摘　　要："企业社会责任在实践中是不是一个伪命题"是一个对社会责任理论研究和实践发展具有重要影响的基础性问题,但长期以来理论界对此却鲜有系统的研究。本文在梳理与反思已有研究成果的基础上,基于企业个体层次构建了三个维度(动力维度、能力维度、结果维度)、六大要素(追求最大限度地增进社会福利、关系优化、影响管理、保持透明、富有道德、制度安排)、三种视角(企业视角、社会视角、利益相关方视角)的企业社会责任检验综合模型,并运用该模型对企业社会责任命题进行了全方位检验。结果显示,企业社会责任在实践中完全可能成为一个有价值的真命题,但需要具备六个方面的条件:由企业界转向企业个体、现代公司的组织模式、领导层心智模式的转换、理性的责权边界共识、合意的外部制度供给和适宜的社会主流氛围。＂Whether CSR is a false proposition in practice＂ is a significant fundamental issue influencing both theoretical research and practice of CSR. However, there is few, if any, systematic research on this issue during the hundred year sever since the concept of CSR was proposed. Based on sorting out and reflecting available literatures, this article structured a systematic testing model involving three dimensions （motivations, abilities and results）, six elements （social welfare maximization, relationship optimization, impact management, transparency maintenance, morality and institutional arrangement）, three perspectives （corporate, social and stakeholder ） and individual level and conducted a comprehensive test over the CSR proposition with the model. Results reveals that CSR may well be a valuable true proposition in practice if six requirements are all met, which are businesses converting to individual enterprises, organizational modes of modern corporation, mental models shifts taking place in leadership level, rational consensus on boundary of rights and obligations, desirable external institution supply and appropriate social mainstream atmosphere.

关 键 词：企业社会责任 真命题 伪命题 社会福利 

分 类 号：F272[经济管理—企业管理]