检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱素云[1]
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属第一医院,福建福州350005
出 处:《中医临床研究》2015年第1期138-139,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察4种不同掰折安瓿方法在临床应用中的使用效果。方法:将200支肝素钠安瓿分成4组,然后随机抽取10个人,每个人用不同的方法各掰折5支。方法 1:用徒手掰折安瓿;方法 2:用无菌棉纱布掰折安瓿;方法 3:用一次性注射器掰折安瓿;方法 4:用莫菲氏滴管掰折安瓿。观察各组实验结果并进行比较。结果:徒手掰折安瓿速度快,但是容易割伤医护人员的手,造成医源性伤害。用无菌棉纱布掰折安瓿成本高,造成资源浪费。用一次性注射器掰折安瓿则容易造成药液污染。用莫菲氏滴管掰折安瓿既能保护医护人员的手,又可以节约资源,提高速度。结论:在临床上医护人员使用莫菲氏滴管掰折安瓿可以更加方便、经济、安全。建议临床护士自行制作并推广应用。Objective: To observe clinical effects of four different breaking off ampoule method in clinical application. Methods: 200 support heparin ampoules were divided into four groups, 10 people were selected to break off 5 support heparin ampoules. Method I. breaking off with freehand; method Ⅱ. breaking off with a sterile cotton cloth; method three: breaking off with a disposable syringe. Results were compared. Results: breaking off ampoule with freehand was qucik and harmful, easy to cause iatrogenic injury. Method two has high costs, and results in a waste of resources; a disposable syringe ampoule liquid is likely to cause pollution. Method three can protect workers hands and save resources. Conclusion: Breaking offwith a disposable syringe was the best chioce for nurses for it's convenience, economic and safey.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145