检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长沙理工大学外国语学院,湖南长沙410114
出 处:《中北大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第1期78-86,共9页Journal of North University of China:Social Science Edition
基 金:2013年湖南省教改课题:基于学习风格的大学英语课外辅助教学研究与实践(湘教通2013243)
摘 要:本研究采用量性研究和质性研究相结合的方法,调查分析高分组与低分组在语言学能上的差异,及学习策略的运用如何影响高分组与低分组语言学能的形成。研究结果表明,高分组被试与低分组被试在语言学能上有不同的倾向性,高分组更善于运用不同的学习策略,这有助于他们几种语言学能的形成与提升;低分组三项学能均值低于高分组,在语言编码学能和语言分析学能上与高分组有显著性差异,学习策略使用频率低且没有长期有意识的运用学习策略,故其语言学能相比高分组而言没有显著性提升。By employing quantitative and qualitative research methods,the paper investigates and analyzes language aptitude differences between a high score group and a low score group and the formation of language aptitude from the perspective of learning strategies,with random sampling and stratified purposeful sampling methods used to select subjects.The results of the study indicate that there are different tendencies between the two groups in language aptitudes;high score group students are better in using different learning strategies which help forming and promoting their language learning aptitudes;means of three low score group's aptitudes are lower than that of the high score group's and there are significant differences between the two groups in the language coding aptitude and the language analysis aptitude.The low score group has no significant improvements in language aptitudes because they have been using learning strategies with less consciousness and lower frequency than the other group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222